Lots of reading so far today. Dealing with a cold and slept quite late.
Read some more of Cecile Bost‘s excellent book “Surdoués: s’intégrer et s’épanouir dans le monde du travail”
Working with Xmind, a mind mapping app, to flush out my thoughts. Apparently mindfulness does not work on me (or people wired like me) so mindmapping it is.
And one more reading of the theory of positive disintegration.
High IQ and society
Joined a couple of groups on Facebook devoted to polymaths after reading an excellent article called, “The Inappropriately Excluded“, which deals with the challenges faced by individuals IQ as they get further and further away from the mean.
A fascinating article from a chap named Grady Towers also touches on difficulties associated with having a high IQ.
A lesson which many gifted persons never learn as long as they live is that human beings in general are inherently very different from themselves in thought, in action, in general intention, and in interests. Many a reformer has died at the hands of a mob which he was trying to improve in the belief that other human beings can and should enjoy what he enjoys. This is one of the most painful and difficult lessons that each gifted child must learn, if personal development is to proceed successfully. It is more necessary that this be learned than that any school subject be mastered. Failure to learn how to tolerate in a reasonable fashion the foolishness of others leads to bitterness, disillusionment, and misanthropy
False self, true (or authentic self)
Reading about the false self and the true self as I continue to wrap my head around giftedness and what it means to my personal, interpersonal and professional lives (identities ?).
This quote from another article on false self vs. true self sums it up well:
Donald Winnicott (1896–1971) was a pediatrician and psychoanalyst who introduced the concept of the True and False Self. The true self, also called the “real self,” is our spontaneous and natural self-expression, a sense of being alive in mind and body that allows us to be genuinely close to others. The false self, similar to Freud’s concept of the superego, develops in compliance with social rules and the moral majority.
To reconnect with their true selves, people need to become aware of their tendencies to satisfy other people’s wants and needs at the expense of their own wants and needs. It is when they become aware of their defense mechanisms and the roots of their development that they will begin to unleash their true selves. Due to the deep unconscious nature of their defense mechanisms, and the significant feelings of emptiness and sadness, psychotherapy would be indicated to help support this process.
This article excerpt is also helpful:
False-self dominance is normal, widespread, and promotes survival vs. growth. It’s like a distrustful, disgruntled violinist, tuba player, and lead tenor pushing their talented conductor off the podium and fighting over who will lead the orchestra. False-self dominance promotes up to five more psychological ‘wounds.’
People who are used to being controlled by a false self experience that as normal. The idea that there is another subself in them that – if allowed to – can consistently make wiser, healthier life decisions is unbelievable. Do you relate?
And this is another good reference on false self vs. true self, though the graphics could use an update. Whereas the other articles discuss the aspects, this one discusses the impacts.
The False Self is an artificial persona that people create very early in life to protect themselves from re-experiencing developmental trauma, shock and stress in close relationships. This False or “public” Self appears polite and well-mannered, and puts on a “show of being real.” Internally, they feel empty, dead or “phoney,” unable to be spontaneous and alive, and to show their True Self in any part of their lives.
Still learning about Docker
And how it is different from a virtual machine. This Stack Overflow article explains it well. And this graphic helped a bit.
Hate springs eternal, irrespective of intelligence
This is fascinating and resonates with my own experience.
According to their study, those with high and low intelligence levels show prejudice. The difference is against whom these people express prejudice.
In their study, those with lower cognitive abilities tended to be prejudiced against “low choice” groups — those who are defined by their ethnicity or sexual orientation, for example. In other words, they hate people who are different from them. Their prejudice stems from a lack of exposure.
In contrast, those with higher cognitive abilities tend to hate, as well, but they hate those people with conservative views, who have a “high choice” in determining with whom they’ll associate. In an ironic way, smartypants hate people who are not accepting of others—but it makes sense. Those with higher intelligence are more empathetic toward others, understanding that their lifestyles may differ from others’.
After downloading it last month, I read through the recent report from the White House on the future of artificial intelligence.